


Author: Fidelity Digital Assets
Translation: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

Mid-year is an excellent checkpoint for investors to assess how market dynamics have shifted and whether the assumptions made at the start of the year still hold true.
In the 2026 Outlook, the Fidelity Digital Assets research team argued that the key this year isn't about an immediate price surge, but rather a more nuanced dynamic: a structural "reshaping" of the entire digital asset ecosystem. While price performance has been mixed—sometimes flat, sometimes volatile—closer inspection reveals several underlying trends that are steadily advancing.
This article reviews the progress of key themes from the 2026 Outlook so far, highlighting where our judgments have been validated, where divergences have emerged, and what these changes might mean going forward.
We anticipated that the integration of digital assets with traditional capital markets would continue to progress in 2026. So far, this trend is indeed moving forward, and in some areas, faster than expected.
Despite volatility in the broader market, demand for digital asset exposure through mainstream financial channels remains strong, and traditional platforms continue to expand their product offerings.
Notably, open interest in spot Bitcoin ETP options—products that only launched as recently as November 2024—is now comparable to that of options settled directly in Bitcoin, reflecting ongoing adoption by institutional and mainstream investors.
Momentum in tokenization is also building, with activity seemingly exceeding expectations. Traditional financial institutions are increasingly launching blockchain-based investment products, while major exchanges are partnering with or acquiring stakes in digital asset platforms to broaden distribution channels and tap into on-chain infrastructure.
At the same time, the regulatory landscape is becoming clearer. A joint guide from the SEC and CFTC establishing a framework for digital asset classification, along with legislative progress like the CLARITY Act, points to a more defined framework for market participants.
Collectively, these developments indicate that digital assets are steadily integrating into the broader financial system, driven by both market demand and infrastructure expansion.

We expected token holder alignment to tighten in 2026, with more on-chain enterprises prioritizing mechanisms like buybacks and clearer ownership structures.
So far, this direction appears unchanged, with ongoing experimentation across the ecosystem: from reserve-based buyback dynamics (e.g., the Hyperliquid/USDC alliance) to governance and structural updates like the Aave DAO/Labs restructuring.
However, despite the broader adoption of these mechanisms, a clear "token holder rights premium" has yet to be fully priced into the market. This trend is advancing but remains in its early stages, as investors evaluate which models can truly deliver sustained value accrual.

We suggested that increased competition from AI computing demand could flatten Bitcoin's hashrate growth, as miners redirect energy and infrastructure toward potentially more profitable avenues. This dynamic may be emerging this year: the 30-day average hashrate and mining difficulty have declined by approximately 8.8% and 7.8%, respectively.


While some of this can be attributed to seasonal factors, particularly winter-related power restrictions, the recent recovery—hashrate rebounding about 1.3% from its low point and difficulty climbing about 8.8%—suggests that weather alone can't fully explain the shift.
Looking at the longer trajectory, the pace of hashrate growth has slowed compared to previous years, which may be an early signal of structural change. The increasing profitability of AI data centers, especially for large operators with access to power infrastructure, seems an increasingly likely driver.
Though still early, the observed slowdown aligns with our initial assessment and may reflect miners gradually pivoting to alternative revenue streams.

We expected that increasing the data limit for the OP_RETURN opcode—used for on-chain data writes, with fees preventing abuse—would not significantly bloat the blockchain. So far, data supports this view.
Usage of larger (≥84 byte) OP_RETURN outputs has remained largely unchanged, and overall blockchain growth stays within the predicted range (approximately 1.35–2.5 MB). Other block utilization metrics show capacity still below 50%, indicating that the increased data flexibility has not placed material strain on the network.
Meanwhile, focus has shifted to broader network dynamics. Bitcoin Knots nodes have shown notable volatility, spiking sharply before declining rapidly, sparking speculation about potential Sybil-like activity.


Based on current data, Bitcoin Core nodes still represent about 77% of the network, while Knots nodes account for approximately 17%. Though still in the minority, this introduces a non-zero risk of an unintended split: under certain conditions, Knots nodes could diverge into a chain that is stagnant or less secure, which, by current estimates, could occur within about 80 days.
However, Core's dominant share continues to anchor network consensus. At the same time, momentum around long-term security upgrades is building. BIP-360 has been streamlined, introducing a quantum-resistant output type (Pay-to-Merkle-Root, or P2MR); ongoing research into OP_CHECKSHRINCS explores hash-based post-quantum signature schemes.
While the exact timeline for a quantum threat remains uncertain, these developments underscore a growing focus on preparing early for the network's future security.

In January, we outlined two scenarios where bulls and bears were evenly matched heading into 2026, expecting macroeconomic conditions to drive non-linear price action despite improving structural fundamentals.
This year, the bearish scenario has largely prevailed: Bitcoin is down 13%, driven by liquidation-induced deleveraging, persistent inflation, and geopolitical uncertainty that pushed markets to price in further rate hikes. However, recent market behavior suggests a more nuanced dynamic.
Following an initial sell-off triggered by recent geopolitical conflicts, Bitcoin rebounded and outperformed traditional assets over the same period, possibly reflecting demand for highly liquid, neutral assets during times of stress.
At the same time, structural tailwinds remain in place, including ongoing institutional capital formation, gradually improving regulatory clarity, and expanding global liquidity.
While the near-term environment remains constrained, our broader thesis appears to hold—just not in a smooth, linear fashion.

We noted that a strong year for gold would not be surprising, underpinned by central bank demand and the global trend of moving away from the dollar-centric system.
This year, gold first rallied nearly 30% amid geopolitical tensions, before retreating to a more modest gain of around 3–4%. Despite the pullback, gold may still outperform by year-end.
Evidence supporting a shift away from the dollar system is also growing, including emerging alternative settlement methods, such as Iran accepting Bitcoin for transit fees and payments linked to activities in the Strait of Hormuz.
Meanwhile, central bank demand for gold remains robust. Recent data shows continued accumulation, and notably, gold has surpassed the US dollar and US Treasuries to become a major component of global reserves.
Gold's performance and persistent central bank demand largely align with our initial assessment; what we anticipated—Bitcoin's subsequent outperformance—has yet to materialize.

At the mid-year mark, the 2026 digital asset landscape presents a balance between short-term pressures and long-term progress. Several themes from the Outlook are developing as expected, particularly in institutional participation, regulation, and infrastructure; others remain early-stage or have yet to fully materialize.
For investors, this underscores the need to look beyond short-term price volatility to see how structural shifts are taking shape. Many of the foundations supporting the next phase of growth appear to be thickening, even if they haven't fully emerged yet.